Friday, September 01, 2006

ESRI International User Conference









As I mentioned in an earlier post, the primary motivation for our trip to San Dieigo was the ESRI International Use Conference, which is put on annually by the maker of the most commonly used commercial GIS software, ArcGIS. I use ArcGIS almost every day at CommEn Space and have been using ESRI products in some form or another for 10 years. The conference was great fun. I always learn new things and gain great inspiration from the Map Gallery. This year was no exception. There were several outstanding sessions, which I describe in some detail below for any readers who happen to be similarly interested in spatial data and analyttical methods, and I'm also including some digital pics of a few of the maps I found particularly intriguing.

Here's a brief rundown on the sessions I attended. Please pardon the rough nature of the notes, most of them were hammered out on my laptop in real time.

Status of NLCD

NLCD has two other products in addition to the landcover--percent impervious and percent tree canopy. The USGS has been using See5 for the classifcation tree; it is highly automated and will enable easily automated updates of national land cover. The canopy cover data set is complete for lower 48; moving on to AK next . Imperviousness is also done for most of the US

For landcover, by end of 2006 most of the lower 48 will be done

Download data here:

gisdata.usgs.net/website/MRLC

www.mrlc.gov

Spatial techniques for Marine Reserve selection
Brian Fulfrost

Ailinginae island--several uninhabited coral attols

Rapid ecological assessment --30 field sites; terestrial bird surveys

Remote sensing on benthic habitat, bathymetry, and vegetatoin changes using quickbird imagery

35 dive sites; somewhat biased locations due to remoteness

Question is how to protect attols biodiversity

Coral
Fish
Birds
Rare species
Range extensions

Derived bathymetry from Quickbird (Daria Siciliano) and also derived benthic classifiation--apparently many papers written on her methods (speaker

NDVI vegetation change analysis

Methods used are: Kriging, regressions, MARXAN (simulated annealing algorithm)

Kiriging: interpolate species richness from sampled points; interpolation from the points, so the surfaces were not very useful because of low N; doesn't look into currents, suitable substrate for larval settlement, etc, also doesn't incorporate ecological barriers (but Constantine @ ESRI has worked out some ways around that)

Regressions: N is too small, so regression has no significance

MARXAN: combines field data w/remote sensing.
1. Planning units
2. Conservation targets
3. Boundary length modifier (looks at adjacency issues)
Used hexagons across the islands
Targets:
Looked at sum irreplaceability--any poly chosen more than 50% of the time represent irreplaceable areas

Best fit model gives you the best output to meet your conservation targets.

MARXAN is not an "ecologically intelligent" tool, it's a decision making tool.

Combine techniques to get the best fit

The influence of Topography on Habitat Area Estimates
Duane J. Haselfeld

PSOMAS--consulting firm in CA

Basic idea here is there is, in some instatnces, a huge discrepancy between plannimetric area and topographic area

The relative increase in the topographic area is directly proportional to the slope--the steeper a place is, the less accurate area measurements will be

At 60 degrees, the error is approx 100%; the error is very low where slope is low, but it increases rapidly--

0-25 degrees, 10% error
25-40 degrees, 30% error
40-60 degrees, 100% error

Emphasizes that elevation is not a surrogate for slope.

Pretty interesting; bottom line is that when area calculations are important, use the topographic area and not the planimetric area


New Landcover Data for the State of Maine
Sanborn office in San Diego

Andrew Lewis worked on the landcover map of Maine

Mike Smith from State of Maine
Mike Palmer from Sanborn in the Ann Arbor office

Project is moving form a 30m to a 5m data layer

Collaborative effort with Maine

Integrated with Federal NLCD/CCAP 2001 projects

Modeling wildlife habitat
Water quality
Imperviousness
Broad level planning initiative

Lots of partners on the project--Federal, state agencies, some non-profit? (Woodlot Alternatives was employed as the field data gathering arm)


Deliverables: 5-meter landcover, based on the NLCD 2001 landcover data classes

5-meter imerviousness data for about 25% of Maine

Recylced a lot of work from the NLCD work


Used SPOT panchromatic; semi-automated approach to binary impervious

Resulting products are CCAP, 5m polygon based map (not as interdigitated landcover classes)

Ran image segmentation on SPOT 5 to get the landcover classes

USed E-cognition for segmentation

Used training data based on the change classes (I think on some field work too)

RFeferred to as a "low cost" option--but how much did it cost?
He mentioned that they're doing some stuff with 1m resolution data

$125k for the SPOT imagery
$100k for the analytical work

Pan sharpening was done in ERDAS Imagine

Energy Mapping in Austria

Because of direct o indirect solar production, increasingly huge land areas are necessary for energy production. Energy will soon be readically impacting zoning throughout the developed world.

Demand indicators:
• Demographics
• Business data
• Using standardized load curves from utilities

1. Demand forecast
2. Potential Generation forecast: concept is a “virtual powerplant” of different types of renewables; transmission doesn’t’ send energy over long distance,s mostly provides stability to the entire network
3. Looking for a locally adapted mix of appropriate renewable energy sources

Look at segmentation for defining homogeneous regions froma grid—looks a bit like thiessen polys; “autoarkic regions”

Equitable Fee Collection Using Enhanced Impervious Surface Data
Lauri Sohl, City of Sioux Falls

All properties in SD are charged a storm drainage fee based upon impervious cover per parcel. Impervious surface includes roads, parking lots, etc

Parcel area X runoff WT factor X unit financial charge

Runoff factor is determined by land use, based on intensity of use

METHODS:

Orthophoto 6” resolution
Infrared IKONOS 4m

Resolution merge using Leica Geosystems Image Analysis Extension; used Borvey transformation, nearest neighbor resample

Feature Extraction by Visual Learning Systems (an extension)—VLS Feature Analyst

Create “learning” feature class.

Conservation Plan for Southeast Pennsylvania
Clare Billet, Smart Conservation, smartconservation.org

***VERY INTERESTING presentation. Looked at terrestrial vertebrates, grid-based from GAP. For aquatic resources, used the watershed. For Terrestrial resources, used GAP and heritage for Rarity (how did they solve the absence of absence problem?)

Focused on top 20% as nodes

Used roads, railways, streams, waterbodies, as barriers for the network analysis

Web-site supports on-line digitizing, analyzes how important that site is, online—pretty amazing

Identifying, Defining, & Mapping Natural Infrastructure in SW Pennsylvania
Andrew Schwartz, Environmental Planning & Design, LLC

Landscape Characterization & Evaluation of Alachua County FL
Partnered with the Information Center for the Environment (ICE) @ UC Davis

No comments: